SAIS Bologna Center   |   Hopkins-Nanjing Center   |   JHU

Press Room   |   Site Map   |   Contact

    

 

SAIS Home

 

Admissions

Academics

 

Prospective Students

Current Students

Alumni

 
 

  

About SAIS in Washington

About SAIS in Bologna

Year of Water

Our Faculty

Return to Research Centers Menu
Center on Politics and Foreign Relations (CPFR)
About CPFR
The Director
Our Partners
Conferences
Political Profiles
Contact Us
Publications
News & Events Archive

For Employers

Human Resources

Support SAIS

SAIS Research Centers

    

Print This Page


Center for Politics and Foreign Relations | Thinking About It

May 15, 2008

Obama-Hillary Dream Team Sounds More Like A Nightmare

By Robert J. Guttman

Forget the so-called dream team scenario.  It will not work.  There are hundreds of very capable vice-presidential candidates waiting to be picked who are not named Hillary Clinton.

Senator Clinton has shown she is tenacious and persistent.  She has shown she has spunk but enough already.  Let’s move on.  The contest is over if one plays by the established rules.  The only way this will linger on is if the Clinton camp—as they seem to be doing—keep changing the rules of the game.  It is getting absurd.

There was an old television program called the Mary Tyler Moore Show and one famous episode had the new writer for the Minneapolis tv station discussing her job before a crusty and cynical old station manager named Lou Grant.  Lou says to Mary “ You’ve got spunk”.  Mary replies, “ Why thank you Lou.”  And Lou bellows “I hate spunk.”

A lot of us feel that way now.  Senator Clinton has the spunk and tenacity to carry her campaign forward—money is another matter—but many Democrats are quite frankly tired and weary of hearing her talk about always working for us and for never giving up and for always saying she won Michigan and Florida and a host of other comments she always brings up in her talks.

Many loyal Democrats –like John Edwards—say gracious things about the senator from New York but after the final primaries on June 3rd—it is time to keep the spunk but leave the spot light and be a loyal soldier and help to elect Obama and his running mate as our next president and vice-president.

The whole primary process has been good for bringing out more voters and it is fine to battle over the issues.  But, in the end, one has to face the music and face up to reality and bow out of the race in a gracious manner.  That time is only a few weeks away.

Senator Clinton, stop talking about everything except delegates because the rules of the game say the person with 2,025 delegates wins the nomination.  Quit saying that the winner needs more because of Michigan and Florida or whatever else pops into her mind.

The country is in a cycle of change.  Voters are calling out for change.  Change is in the air with hopes that this election will be pivotal and the country can pursue another course after eight years of the current administration’s policies.
Having a Clinton on the ticket would not sound like change was at hand.  Change does not come from the people protecting the status quo or even worse trying to go back in time to protect and defend her husband’s presidency in the 1990s.

Looking for real change Obama should not pick Senator Clinton.  Break the mold.  Don’t choose the person who finished second for political reasons.  Reach out to someone new and bring in someone with a positive approval rating who does not play fast and loose with the facts.

And, looking at our history since 1980 until now there has been a Bush or a Clinton on the national ticket—for twenty-eight years.  With two terms of Obama that would make a Bush or Clinton in the White House as president or vice-president for thirty-six years.

In a country of well over 300 million people we do not need to look for two political families to populate the White House forever.  It is time for a real change.

Senator Obama and Senator Clinton may sound like a dream team to some people but to this writer it sounds more like a nightmare.

Robert J. Guttman
Founder and Director, CPFR

Click here to return to the Thinking About It archive.

Tools and Resources

Events Calendar

SAIS Webmail

Library Services

ISIS

SAIS Insider

MyJohnsHopkins

Thinking About It

September 11, 2008

Foreign Policy Focus: McCain and Obama

The 2008 presidential campaign began with one key foreign policy issue – Iraq.  The Democratic presidential nominee, Senator Barack Obama, was seen by Democratic activist voters in the primaries and caucuses as being the most anti-war of the candidates.  This certainly was a key to his eventual success over Senator Hillary Clinton, who was not seen as being as anti-war in her views.  Obama could rightly say he was against American involvement in Iraq even before he became a United States Senator.  He has been for a timetable to bring U.S. troops home since becoming the junior senator from Illinois.  On his trip this summer to Iraq he seemed to have the president of Iraq agree with his timetable for withdrawal.

Iraq was also a large issue in helping Senator John McCain win the Republican nomination for president.  The senator from Arizona has been outspoken in his views on Iraq, which are almost the exact opposite of his Democratic opponent.  McCain calls for victory in Iraq before American troops can leave.  The former fighter pilot in the Vietnam War has been a champion of the troop surge of American soldiers that most analysts feel has helped change the military situation on the ground more favorably for the Iraqis and the Americans. 

However, something strange has happened on the road to the general election...

Click here to read more

Click here to access the Thinking About It archive

Click here for an article on Obama's early life
McCain and Obama on the Issues
Program Links

Read about transatlantic relations on our sister website:
Transatlantic Magazine